Resilience to the worst of humanity
The average person is selfish, greedy, not very intelligent and an emotionally stunted illogical thinker. How can any economic system win the support of the majority if these things are true
–
Any system has to defend against human stupidity which is unlimited. Just look at society and what the average person watches on television.
Any system cannot rely on the best of humanity or values such as integrity, honesty, camaraderie, honour.
I am interested in ideas that are resilient.
The average person has the intellectual reasoning to buy something and wait for something to rise in value. This is the extent of the average person's intellectual abilities. Not in inventing new things or creating something original.
I have retired from design for corporations and I am focusing on design for life and for the planet. I have chosen to focus on the concept of resilience.
In 2015, I incorporated a business that would focus on building leaders to design a resilient society (BLDRS) and called it BLDRS Collective Inc. The corporation hasn’t really succeeded as a business. But the idea has resonated with the Design Science Studio and afforded me the opportunity to participate in the first coheART of this education incubator and initiative of the Buckminster Fuller Institute and habRitual.
I am no expert in resilience. I share the same question, How do we help people learn about syntropy and resilience in a culture that has been designed for entropy and fragility?
与其说普通人是人贪婪的、愚蠢的，不如说是现存的经济系统和社会体系鼓励了普通人的贪婪和愚蠢。所以我们要创造个鼓励发明新事物、奖励原创、鼓励诚实……的经济/社会体系。
同意，[尹与及]，还有一句话，“一分钱一分货”，这句话在统计上是正确的，所以可以提出一个问题——如何进化出人类价值中最好的特征。可以执行对进化行为的技术研究（具有 良好的动画模拟），并且与该类别相关。
Agree, [尹与及], and there's also a saying, "You get what you reward for," which is statistically true, so the question could be raised, -- how to evolve the features that are the best of human values. The technical research (with good animated simulations) into the behaviors that evolve can be performed, and is relevant to this category.
[+]
我认为这是非常简单和基本的。只是让人们更容易组建和维护当地社区。其余的将就位。社区是人类的基本需求。一个健康的当地社区将满足所有其他人类需求，例如食物和住所。让我们来了解一下基础知识。这就是我们的技术应该促进的东西，通过自给自足的社区，简单和人类生存。另外，我真的反对称大多数人为愚蠢和自私。当你这样做时，这就是你会得到的。他们都在同一时间，但都想站在好的一面，社区的一面。那只是连接到我们身上。我们靠在一起才能生存。我们的大脑发育成彼此和平相处。简单地说，如果你成功地从社区之外提供基本需求，你就会失败，因为拥有社区有什么意义。所以我们都会孤独和痛苦，就像现在一样。我们已经有了。
I think it's very simple and basic. Just make it easy for people to form and maintain local communities. The rest will fall in place. Community is a basic human need. a healthy local community will take care of all other human needs, like food and shelter. Let's get to the basics. That's what our tech should facilitate, the simplicity and f human existence, thru self sufficient communities. Also, I really object to calling most people stupid and selfish. When you do, that's what you gonna get. They are all at the same time, but all wanna be on the good side, side of community. That's just wired into us. We survive by clinging together. Our brains develop to live in peace with each other. Simply, if you succeed in providing basic needs from outside the community, you will fail , for what's the point of having the community. So we all gonna be lonely and miserable, just like now. We already have it.
我们真正需要的是一块土地，形成新的公社，培育更好的文化。建立全新的比修复旧的要容易得多。我们拥有大量技术，但土地始终是最大的问题。简单地说，所有土地都被少数人占领，这就是所有苦难的根源。唯一可以帮助它的方法是更多的共享，通过更广泛地扩展土地。我希望区块链上产生的财富可以用于那个，这是我的希望。
What we really need a s land, to form new communes, nurturing better culture. Building brand new is much easier then fixing the old. We got plenty of tech but land is always the biggest problem. Simply, all land been horded up by just a few people, and that's the root cause of all the misery. The only way it can be helped is by more sharing, by spreading land a little wider. I hope wealth generated on Blockchain can be used for that, that's my hope.
我同意土地是问题所在。它太贵了，利润动机已经取代了其他所有的土地用途。即使某些东西在社会上有利可图，金钱激励也是第一位的。
庇护人们应该是一个充满爱心的社区或社会的全社会要求。但事实并非如此。利润是。
I agree land is the problem. It's too expensive and the profit motive has superseded every other use of land. Even if something is socially profitable, the money incentive comes first.
Sheltering people should be a society wide imperative of a loving community or society. But it isn't. Profit is.